Late final 12 months, Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Vancouver, Canada over alleged violations of U.S. commerce sanctions with Iran. This week, the Canadian authorities introduced it’ll enable for the manager’s extradition to proceed.
Officers within the Division of Justice Canada have issued an Authority to Proceed, a proclamation that formally begins the extradition course of, which may ship Wanzhou to the U.S. to face costs.
Wanzhou, who can be the daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, has discovered herself on the heart of an ongoing dispute between the smartphone maker and the U.S. authorities. In January, an indictment was unsealed linking Wanzhou to alleged financial institution fraud designed to assist the corporate circumvent U.S./Iranian sanctions.
“The choice follows a radical and diligent evaluate of the proof on this case,” the Canadian DOJ writes in a press release. “The Division is glad that the necessities set out by the Extradition Act for the issuance of an Authority to Proceed have been met and there may be adequate proof to be put earlier than an extradition choose for resolution.”
It goes on to notice that that is simply step one towards extradition. A choose will hear the case, adopted by the Minister of Justice, who will in the end resolve whether or not Wanzhou must be surrendered.
Replace: Attorneys for Meng Wanzhou have offered TechCrunch a press release relating to at the moment’s information.
We’re disillusioned that the Minister of Justice has determined to situation an Authority to Proceed within the face of the political nature of the U.S., costs and the place the President of the US has repeatedly said that he would intervene in Ms. Meng’s case if he thought it will help the U.S. negotiations with China over a commerce deal.
We’re additionally involved that the Minister has accepted an ATP in circumstances the place the conduct alleged to be an offence within the U.S. wouldn’t be an offence in Canada. That is an affront to the foundational extradition precept of double criminality.
Our consumer maintains that she is harmless of any wrongdoing and that the U.S. prosecution and extradition constitutes an abuse of the processes of legislation.
Our consumer appears ahead to having her rights vindicated within the judicial section of the extradition course of.