SPORTS

Connecticut senators rip College Football Playoff expansion: ‘It’s just another cash grab’

The College Football Playoff seems able to develop within the close to future. The four-team occasion might quickly grow to be a 12-team match, and that has led to combined reactions amongst school soccer followers.

Some love the concept. Others hate it.

Among the latter class are two Connecticut senators who’re frightened about whether or not the NCAA has the most effective pursuits of the athletes in thoughts or if the governing physique is simply searching for “one other money seize.”

“The solely assured end result of an expanded playoff area and longer season is extra league revenue that the gamers received’t see a dime of – it’s simply one other money seize,” stated Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. in an announcement to USA Today Sports. “I doubt if the truth that this may improve the danger of participant damage even got here up.”

MORE: How Notre Dame matches in a 12-team College Football Playoff

Blumenthal was backed up by his counterpart, Chris Murphy, D-Conn, who spoke in regards to the athletes not having a say on this choice.

“This is one other instance of the big-time school sports activities executives and directors making selections simply to extend their very own income, whereas persevering with to place the wants and well being of school athletes on the again burner,” Murphy stated. “It’s loopy that the athletes who create the product have zero say in a choice as large as this, and can get not one of the tens of millions in revenue that shall be created by extra video games.

“This is precisely why I launched laws that might assist these athletes arrange and collectively cut price for themselves.”

Currently, the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee is making an attempt to craft a regulation that might give school athletes an opportunity to revenue from their title, picture and likeness (NIL). This contains athletes with the ability to signal endorsement offers, signal autographs for pay and earn cash on varied social media platforms, like YouTube.

MORE: Why expanded playoff ought to imply one fewer common season recreation

Thus, it is no shock that Blumenthal, who chairs the committee, and Murphy can be against any such playoff enlargement. They need to make sure that athletes aren’t being exploited, particularly given the inconsistent security pointers and missing well being protection that student-athletes obtain.

Still, these senators’ opinions aren’t prone to have an effect on potential enlargement for the College Football Playoff. What they’ll do is proceed to debate points involving the NCAA as they appear to create an NIL regulation for athletes and, probably, pursue another laws designed to learn student-athletes.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
%d bloggers like this: